<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One in Three Killed By Drones in Pakistan Is a Civilian</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rethinkafghanistan.com/blog/2010/03/report-one-in-three-killed-by-drones-in-pakistan-is-a-civilian/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rethinkafghanistan.com/blog/2010/03/report-one-in-three-killed-by-drones-in-pakistan-is-a-civilian/</link>
	<description>Rethinking our policy toward Afghanistan requires vigorous public debate and Congressional oversight. Every major war or military action since World War II has come under the microscope of Congressional oversight hearings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 20:05:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 1 in 3 Killed By Drones in Pakistan Is a Civilian &#124; The Pakistani Spectator</title>
		<link>http://rethinkafghanistan.com/blog/2010/03/report-one-in-three-killed-by-drones-in-pakistan-is-a-civilian/comment-page-1/#comment-2016</link>
		<dc:creator>1 in 3 Killed By Drones in Pakistan Is a Civilian &#124; The Pakistani Spectator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 02:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rethinkafghanistan.com/blog/?p=1789#comment-2016</guid>
		<description>[...] Rethink Afghanistan  Trackback URL         Tagged as: New America [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rethink Afghanistan  Trackback URL         Tagged as: New America [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robster</title>
		<link>http://rethinkafghanistan.com/blog/2010/03/report-one-in-three-killed-by-drones-in-pakistan-is-a-civilian/comment-page-1/#comment-2013</link>
		<dc:creator>robster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 17:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rethinkafghanistan.com/blog/?p=1789#comment-2013</guid>
		<description>Think of them as suicide bombers without human bodies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think of them as suicide bombers without human bodies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robster</title>
		<link>http://rethinkafghanistan.com/blog/2010/03/report-one-in-three-killed-by-drones-in-pakistan-is-a-civilian/comment-page-1/#comment-2012</link>
		<dc:creator>robster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 17:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rethinkafghanistan.com/blog/?p=1789#comment-2012</guid>
		<description>We are not at war with Pakistan- but we are at war with elements in it. If Pakistan can&#039;t control illegal military combatants from operating within it&#039;s territory then it should chose sides.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are not at war with Pakistan- but we are at war with elements in it. If Pakistan can&#39;t control illegal military combatants from operating within it&#39;s territory then it should chose sides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: msbeal</title>
		<link>http://rethinkafghanistan.com/blog/2010/03/report-one-in-three-killed-by-drones-in-pakistan-is-a-civilian/comment-page-1/#comment-2011</link>
		<dc:creator>msbeal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 13:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rethinkafghanistan.com/blog/?p=1789#comment-2011</guid>
		<description>Who are these &#039;civilians&#039; standing next to terrorist?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who are these &#39;civilians&#39; standing next to terrorist?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geralderikson</title>
		<link>http://rethinkafghanistan.com/blog/2010/03/report-one-in-three-killed-by-drones-in-pakistan-is-a-civilian/comment-page-1/#comment-2010</link>
		<dc:creator>geralderikson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 13:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rethinkafghanistan.com/blog/?p=1789#comment-2010</guid>
		<description>our comment has merit but it fails to consider one very important thing: You are trying to compare WWII with a gorilla war.   Totally different.  The problem sir is the fighting a gorilla style battles in Afghan is not a war of choice.  The war of choice would be a WWII style.  And winning means the Taliban and Al Queda put out of action permanently, like Nazis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>our comment has merit but it fails to consider one very important thing: You are trying to compare WWII with a gorilla war.   Totally different.  The problem sir is the fighting a gorilla style battles in Afghan is not a war of choice.  The war of choice would be a WWII style.  And winning means the Taliban and Al Queda put out of action permanently, like Nazis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://rethinkafghanistan.com/blog/2010/03/report-one-in-three-killed-by-drones-in-pakistan-is-a-civilian/comment-page-1/#comment-2009</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 12:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rethinkafghanistan.com/blog/?p=1789#comment-2009</guid>
		<description>I think that the alternatives are either all out war or leaving entirely.  All out war would certainly kill many more civilians.  Leaving entirely would not change the radical feelings that the Pashtoons or Taliban have toward the U.S.  What is the answer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the alternatives are either all out war or leaving entirely.  All out war would certainly kill many more civilians.  Leaving entirely would not change the radical feelings that the Pashtoons or Taliban have toward the U.S.  What is the answer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dhussey</title>
		<link>http://rethinkafghanistan.com/blog/2010/03/report-one-in-three-killed-by-drones-in-pakistan-is-a-civilian/comment-page-1/#comment-2008</link>
		<dc:creator>dhussey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 12:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rethinkafghanistan.com/blog/?p=1789#comment-2008</guid>
		<description>Cowardly perhaps?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cowardly perhaps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dhussey</title>
		<link>http://rethinkafghanistan.com/blog/2010/03/report-one-in-three-killed-by-drones-in-pakistan-is-a-civilian/comment-page-1/#comment-2007</link>
		<dc:creator>dhussey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 12:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rethinkafghanistan.com/blog/?p=1789#comment-2007</guid>
		<description>You should apply for a job with the Whitehouse. They can use some good empty rhetoric like yours. The only way to bring peace to the region is to leave and take the British &quot;Lines on the Map&quot; with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should apply for a job with the Whitehouse. They can use some good empty rhetoric like yours. The only way to bring peace to the region is to leave and take the British &#8220;Lines on the Map&#8221; with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dhussey</title>
		<link>http://rethinkafghanistan.com/blog/2010/03/report-one-in-three-killed-by-drones-in-pakistan-is-a-civilian/comment-page-1/#comment-2006</link>
		<dc:creator>dhussey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 12:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rethinkafghanistan.com/blog/?p=1789#comment-2006</guid>
		<description>A history of brutality does not remove the immorality of non-combatants. Perhaps they should start using these drones to take out suspected drug dealers in America. If you only lost a civilian or two to get the bad guy that would be just fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A history of brutality does not remove the immorality of non-combatants. Perhaps they should start using these drones to take out suspected drug dealers in America. If you only lost a civilian or two to get the bad guy that would be just fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rogerhwerner</title>
		<link>http://rethinkafghanistan.com/blog/2010/03/report-one-in-three-killed-by-drones-in-pakistan-is-a-civilian/comment-page-1/#comment-2005</link>
		<dc:creator>rogerhwerner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 09:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rethinkafghanistan.com/blog/?p=1789#comment-2005</guid>
		<description>Your comment has merit but it fails to consider one very important thing:  These killings occur within a country we&#039;re not at war with.   Pakistan is purportedly our ally in the war on terror and we&#039;re killing its citizens?  Have you asked yourself what the reaction might be if the people being killed by drones were white Christians?  My attitude about the Afghan conflict is simple:  If this fight is so important to our national security then we shouldn&#039;t hesitate to pull out all stops to win and that includes willingly accepting collateral damage.  In World War II we didn&#039;t worry about killing civilians because all that mattered was winning an unconditional surrender.  The problem sir is that the Afghan war is a war of choice and quite possibly illegal.  That being the case, Americans can&#039;t fight as if we were in a legitimate war and this is why it is going to be very hard to win it whatever winning means.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your comment has merit but it fails to consider one very important thing:  These killings occur within a country we&#39;re not at war with.   Pakistan is purportedly our ally in the war on terror and we&#39;re killing its citizens?  Have you asked yourself what the reaction might be if the people being killed by drones were white Christians?  My attitude about the Afghan conflict is simple:  If this fight is so important to our national security then we shouldn&#39;t hesitate to pull out all stops to win and that includes willingly accepting collateral damage.  In World War II we didn&#39;t worry about killing civilians because all that mattered was winning an unconditional surrender.  The problem sir is that the Afghan war is a war of choice and quite possibly illegal.  That being the case, Americans can&#39;t fight as if we were in a legitimate war and this is why it is going to be very hard to win it whatever winning means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

