Get Rethink Afghanistan Updates
Join us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Twitter Get E-Mail Updates
You can help
Wikileaks And OpSec
Posted by The Agonist on July 26th, 2010

From our partners at The Agonist

Anyone who thinks the publication of the ‘War Logs’ by Wikileaks, NYT, The Guardian and Der Spiegel, is an unalloyed good needs to think again. By and large what was leaked and subsequently posted was a public good. It’s a public good in that we now have a fuller picture of what’s really happening in AfPak and it’s aggregated in one place.

However, there are some very real issues of OpSec. Wikileaks did not redact the names of many people in the reports it published. Why is that problematic? Well, just read this series of tweets by Joshua Foust (someone whom I trust when it comes to all things AfPak):

I hope Engineer Kareem has a safe place to hide in Ghazni, because Wikileaks has put his life in danger.

Or this:

Bakwa Mafia, a local contractor working in Farah, is no longer safe because of Wikileaks.

Or this:

Single data point: John Reynolds cannot travel to Pakistan again, ever, because of Wikileaks.

That’s just a sample of what he found in a short time. It is simply unconscionable that these names were not redacted. There is no excuse for it. I’m appalled, actually. These people are very, very much at risk of death now. (And before someone chimes in with their “who cares, they are the military, after all,” well, what about the Afghan contractor who’s now been exposed working for the US? Or the local Afghan engineer? Dude’s just trying to feed his family. Do you want his blood on his hands so you can feel righteous?) What Wikileaks has done here is not only irresponsible, but immoral.

Look, on balance, I like what Assange is doing, but let’s not fool ourselves in thinking that everything Wikileaks, or Assange does is an unadulterated public good. It’s not. And it’s a shame that we have to rely on a brazen self-promoter like Assange to fill the vacuum the Versailles media has created.

Share this:

to “Wikileaks And OpSec”

  1. Zwi says:

    The remarks by The Agonist seem just silly. Wikileaks isn't one ten thousandth of the calamity going on Afghanistan. If everyone of those people is assassinated tomorrow, it won't even be a blip on the assassination list of drone attacks. The US military is a criminal organization occupying a victim country. Anything that contributes to their removal is progress. I am not a political elite that gleefully condemns whole populations to torment and death, the way that the political elites of DC do, but I can't avoid the comparison between the slight risk incurred by those named and the risks incurred by civilians and soldiers in gigantic numbers because of the overall crimes of occupation.

  2. Jeansansterre says:

    I think Hillary Clinton does not fuck enough…

  3. Jeansansterre says:

    This is why she has a big ass.

Peacemakers take action to lead the charge to end the war. Join forces with the over 100,000 people who make a difference.


Subscribe via RSS
Become a Peacemaker

Bronze Telly Award
For general questions, email us here.
For technical issues regarding this site, contact us here.


For Press inquiries, please contact Kim at:

Director: Robert Greenwald - Executive Director: Jim Miller - Producer: Jason Zaro - Associate Producer: Dallas Dunn, Jonathan Kim, and Kim Huynh - Researcher: Greg Wishnev - Editor: Phillip Cruess - Political Director: Leighton Woodhouse - VP Marketing & Distribution: Laura Beatty - Production Assistant: Monique Hairston

Anyone is allowed to post content on this site, but Brave New Foundation 501(c)(3) is not responsible for that content. We will, however, remove anything unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, racist, or that contains other material that would violate the law. By posting you agree to this.

Brave New Foundation | 10510 Culver Blvd., Culver City, CA 90232